With most topics, I find fastgpt to be the most up to date, accurate and best sourced. And with just a normal search there's basically just one expandable strip with AI, no real annoyance for me.
"[...] switching the default search engine back to Bing [...] from Google Search (or whatever other browser is set as default)."
Google is a Browser now, neat. And somehow it's relevant in a post about search engines.
"Microsoft Edge, the default browser pre-installed on Windows machines, and Bing Search aren't bad products by any means - they are solid alternatives to Google's own Chrome and Search."
They may be good compared to Chrome and now also Google. But even rotten eggs are better than literal shit, at least for most people.
Kagi only lists postgresql.org for the first 10 entries, but outdated ones in first place. With the programming scope it collapses all official do s entries to one, with GH and SO filling the rest.
For the quick answer, it also uses the 'outdated' docs as source, but as it only gives a very shallow overview there shouldn't be any difference in version (i.e. it checks for a value in a list in all versions the same, and quick answer leaves out details specific to different versions)
If I see someone boasting about programming with AI, in 0.1% of cases they use it responsibly (as a tool to quickly get introduced into a topic and brainstorm ideas) and the rest of times they're probably a script kiddie letting ChatGPT do advent of code or smth and calling themselves programmers.
Do not worry, for they have fallen like many of our siblings; yet they are in a better place than some, like windows users.