they also might be mediocre, or much worse. Given Tesla's record of bad/rushed design and manufacturing processes (see: bad panel alignment; bad chassis engineering; janky bandaid fixes like random hardware store supplies making it into their cars; failed and costly manufacturing automation mistakes; etc.),
And Musk's record of using the same trick of dangling a new gimmick to fix cash flow over and over (make wild new promise to create hype, while not delivering on the old ones, see: hyperloop, full self-driving feature, etc)
And how he's been steadily going off the deep end for years (gestures generally)
I don't really have hope that this isn't the ludicrous gimmick it stinks of.
That's exactly why there's entire store shelves dedicated to selling magazines preying on insecurities about how men look, shows like househusbands of Atlanta, the Kardashian brothers, and why women men are known for talking trash about each other's appearance in the workplace
There's aesthetic differences stemming from simple original taste, then there's differences stemming from being on the challenged side of the bell curve. Like smearing poop on a wall and trying to call it art.
I really can't fathom anyone seriously thinking this is good aesthetically without assuming they have a serious bias affecting their judgement in form of payment, cognitive deficiency, misplaced Musk sympathy, or otherwise.
Other auto makers are doing just fine with their designs overall, we don't need to include children's scribbles of a car when talking about where car designs should be headed.
wart on your tart?
ignoramus sands his anus?