Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)ON
Posts
14
Comments
737
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Shovel 14 tons what do ya get? Another day older and deeper in debt. St. Peter don't you call cuz I anit home. I owe my soul to the company store.

    Work has too many variables that make it shitty to think the grass is greener just by changing the location you work in. I've switched industries drastically a couple times and returned to some and feel strongly that people of the similar flock together. So even if you changed the people you work for or with by mowing towns, but dont change careers, it's likely your next job will have the same personality types as the people you currently hate working for.

  • Not being a dick but how are the election result reporting not unbiased? They're all using the exact same API so the numbers shouldn't deviate as long as they're all in sync. I'm sure as shit not tuning into a network news station so sorry for the ignorance.

  • Theyre government ran programs. People expect them to operate with the efficiency of any normal business. The problem is businesses operating to the rules of a "free" market are driven by entirely different rules than the ones driving a government ran program.

    In the government, program funding is dictated by the people in office and their political alignments. First looking at a scenario where the people in office are in support of a program the following outcomes usually happen: 1. Program is successful resulting in stagnant budget growth when times are good and budget cuts when times are bad. 2. Program is unsuccessful resulting in the people in office responsible for the program being unable to call the failing program a failure so they advocate for increasing the budget. Every raise and tier of compensation to the employees is decided in DC and eliminates all shreds of performance or tenure based raises. Employees working for government programs have absolutely no reason to want to excel at their job.

    The concept is completely futile. Inprovments only come when enough people get so sick and tired of a program's incompetencies that people protest or the media catches wind to make it a talking point important enough to affect elections.

    It's the foundation to Marge Simpson's sisters on the Simpson's and how they are shown working at the DMV. Incase you needed supporting citation for my opinion.

    I'm also not commenting as any advocate for either political side nor am I implying "there's no difference between the right and left." I'm simply saying the foundation that government programs must adhere to will never produce an efficient operating environment for any program to succeed under.

  • To add to that, we also the only generation who lived thru the only housing bubble giving a hesitation to the concept that realestate has always been the safest investment. They're buying high but are able to control most of not all extrinsic variables that could keep them from selling higher than they purchased. There aren't many ways to invest money that you 100% either control the out come of or can insure what you cant control. The exceptions like community wide property value loss are still specific to the properties location that you decide before purchase. I know there are cases where your research before buying can fuck you but it's still more control than investing in the market where everything about the value of your asset is out of your hands. All you can control is how it's value is managed.

  • Fuckin Arcade, NY is scumbag central. From the cops to the meth heads anyone with a shred of dignity gets out of the shit hole young and never looks back. What's left gets dumber, lazier, slower and uglier by every passing generation. Fuck Arcade, NY.

  • I mean, noone used reddit 10 years ago. To a 37 year old like myself, that seems like the reddit shit blew up out of nowhere. Youtube is just a matter of time and outcome of future google break up cases before a legitimate competition comes for its industry share. FB will die with the boomers. The only one I see as a really unmovable object is Twitter because of the universal use by all major sports media/reporting/journalists. It's the only one with end users applying the platform in any comercial sense outside of marketing. I think the question OP is asking will on the reliance of one of the other platforms falling.

    Just my opinion tho so take it with a grain of salt.

  • I bring this up the time how Reagan didn't win in a landslide, Mondale fuckin lost in a land slide.

    Even the worst NFL team will destroy the next best team they could face that was worse than them. Mondale was your local junior college team going up against the Jets. A 50-1 score is spun as the Jets winning in a land slide and not spun as how shitty the junior college was.

  • That you don't understand the realestate market? Or you didn't know this has been projected for a decade now from millennials getting as old as the avg age of first time home buyers and being the largest % share of the US population creating more demand than available supply?

  • The other part i don't see anyone mentioning is that this was all projected as a result of millennial generation, the largest % of population by generation comparison, came into the age of buying homes. Creating a sharp spike in demand over supply.

  • I wanna say there is a hierarchy of enforcability to trademarks, copyrights and patents on top of their application requisites. I also think that Patents are sort of the top tier that all regulations apply to with a trickle down effect in how they apply to TM's and C's. Don't quote me on it tho. I'm going off the time at work years ago when the idea of patenting or tradmarking a thing. I might also be mixing it up with how they regulate Trademarks vs Registered Copyrights.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • You know they aren't a cell phone company anymore but primarily focus on telecommunication infrastructure and IoT technology, right? Fueling a $23 Billion revenue stream. The hack is to give access abilities to the 3rd largest telecommunications company in the world. You say the data is only worth $20,000 but I don't think you have a very good understanding of corporate espionage value. The hacker is selling an unsubstantiated tool (as in something to use not that its an actual tool or software), that is illegal to use, from unverified seller. The value of something doesn't ever reflect the value of the product it reflects the value people are willing to pay for the product. The access to a multi billion dollar telecommunications company is worth a fuckton itself, but that's not what they're selling. They're selling the ability to access that data which carries, like I said, tons of risk and potential cost. The hacker prolly does this to mitigate fallout if caught by selling access to data and not the data itself.