We have a great graffiti made around here. Cannabis leaves with an angry face. It's been there for as long as I can remember, ever since I was a kid, like probably 30+ years. All of the other walls get painted over, but not this one. The graffiti is really good, I mean really good. I don't think anyone has the heart to paint over it, and I'm glad, it's kind of like a monument now.
Well, you just set the second to ignore all inconsistencies regarding libraries and binaries from the first one. It sounds easier than it is to actually put in practice π.
I was just experimenting, trying to see if the trouble is worth it... it's not. Way too many ways to still fuck up your system... and I eventually did π. Luckily, I use BTRFS with snapshots, so no harm no foul, I just rolled back everything from the day before I decided to install the second package manager.
No, just a bad experience trying to actually run 2 of them on the same system. One was the main, the other was supposed to "patch" what the first one lacked... and then I realized that compiling from source and packaging with the original (first) package manager is a lot less painful than trying to juggle with both of them.
Try Void, stable AF IMO. I have yet to run into "unfixable bugs" (whatever that means). And even if there are, you open an issue on GH and there will be a patch most likely. If it's a kernel bug, you'll just have to open an issue on the Linux kernel git repo.
Mhm. The exact same reason why I would recommend them to anyone that actually
wants to know how Linux works, the dos and donts (like why having 2 or more package managers is a REALLY REALLY bad idea).
0x4E4F @ 0x4E4F @sh.itjust.works Posts 214Comments 1,718Joined 2 yr. ago
Yes, first Rust code was released in 6.6 I think and MS also started implementing Rust code in the Windows kernel.