How could the average Joe even start to guess what this could ever mean ?
Yeah, weird way to describe it. Why not just say percentage of workers in a union?
Exactly ! (...and thanks for its meaning).
The funniest part is the title also says : "You Read That Right" ...well, no ! ...I didn't since it was unreadable for me :-O
Because "union density" is shorter. Just as "GDP" is shorter than "sum of the income of everyone in a country".
It's also just their opinion. The results aren't out yet.
If only that average Joe had access to some type of information network on which to look it up, if only. But alas...
How could the average Joe even start to guess what this could ever mean ?
Yeah, weird way to describe it. Why not just say percentage of workers in a union?
Exactly ! (...and thanks for its meaning).
The funniest part is the title also says : "You Read That Right" ...well, no ! ...I didn't since it was unreadable for me :-O
Because "union density" is shorter. Just as "GDP" is shorter than "sum of the income of everyone in a country".
It's also just their opinion. The results aren't out yet.
If only that average Joe had access to some type of information network on which to look it up, if only. But alas...