Government's U-turn on lower speed limits will cost lives
Government's U-turn on lower speed limits will cost lives

Government's U-turn on lower speed limits will cost lives - safety expert

Government's U-turn on lower speed limits will cost lives
Government's U-turn on lower speed limits will cost lives - safety expert
Seems like “the rot” has reached New Zealand too, eh?
What rot? What TF are you on about?
It'd be nice if they have some actual policies, above and beyond "reverse everything labour did". Ffs
They’re making English an official language.
I for one am pleased to finally be able to conduct my life in English. Maybe now we can have English taught in schools and some tv channels primarily in English too?
As will their smoke free capitulation. They don't care
There is a concept of acceptable risk when making these decisions, I.E how much is a reasonable amount to spend on preventing a death.
It's used extensively in the building industry to calculate how seismically resistant a building must be, or whether sprinkler systems etc will be required in a building.
Some of the changes made by Labour were just daft, in my view, and the extra travel time and loss of productivity did not justify the small increase in safety. There were also a number of roads such as the Napier-Taupo road, where Labour decided lowering the speed limit was a better option than making much needed safety improvements to the road, or even just maintaining the road.
I'm personally glad to see the blanket approach to speed limits being abandoned.
This is why I don't think central government should really get involved, as it becomes a political issue and loses nuance. This is a technical thing that we have experts for, you can guarantee they weren't involved in the 'policy' formation. They may be used or twisted to justify things, but it's the tail wagging the dog, really...
I totally agree about acceptable risk being one of those nuanced factors. NZTA used to deal with this all the time, from what I understand...
There are a couple of truths here that are being ignored or barely touched on:
You're quite right, setting speed limits is something that should be done at arms length from the politicians.
Aren't there other benefits besides increased safety like decreased wear on the road and air and noise pollution?
My issue is with their approach.
Napier - Taupō is a blanket reduction to 80kph. For much of the route this absolutely makes sense but there are stretches where it’s flat, wide and straight. Crawling along these parts are painful. Would it be that hard to change the limits for these sections?
Moving all of SH2 between Featherston and Masterton was equally maddening. Most of this road is wide, straight and with good visibility
They’ve reduced it to 80kph but left all the side roads 100 so all the locals are now careening down these roads at higher speed.
The number of signs I went past on Napier-taupo protesting the changes was quite surprising, it was pretty clear the locals were against the changes. Similar story with the Wairarapa, I assume.
I also managed to wheelspin, on the road, in an AWD vehicle, in second or third gear. The road surface was in appalling condition.
We know it will cost lives. They know it will cost lives. But their justification is basically "we campaigned on it and you voted for us".
Kinda fair enough, we get the government we deserve.
Problem is that the half that deserve it get to inflict the same on the other half too.
Personally, I'm glad Transmission Gully and the Kapiti Expressway are going to 110, it's one of the safest roads in the country, despite the fact that the speed limit is ignored wholesale.