‘Everything indicates’ Chinese ship damaged Baltic pipeline on purpose, Finland says

Article is basically "Finland's Minister of European Affairs Anders Adlercreutz speculates on things."

“I'm not the sea captain. But I would think that you would notice that you're dragging an anchor behind you for hundreds of kilometers"

I'm also not a sea captain that has no idea how a container ship would act if it were dragging an anchor.

“If I as a captain would have done something that the Chinese government wouldn't approve of, then I would be concerned about returning with my boat to China”

So you'd go fugitive and leave everything you know over what might be an industrial accident?

This is the best summary I could come up with:

BRUSSELS — As the investigation into damage to Baltic Sea critical infrastructure continues, Finland's Minister of European Affairs Anders Adlercreutz said it’s hard to believe sabotage to the undersea gas pipeline was accidental — or that it happened without Beijing’s knowledge.

Finland and Estonia have been investigating the rupture of the Balticconnector, a 77-kilometer-long gas pipeline that connects the two NATO members beneath the Baltic Sea.

An investigation by Finnish authorities identified as the main suspect Chinese container ship Newnew Polar Bear, which is believed to have dragged its anchor across the Baltic Sea seabed, cutting through the cables and gas lines.

The Baltic Times reported earlier this week that the two European countries have asked to send representatives to Beijing to investigate the vessel, which is currently en route to a Chinese port.

Estonian Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur expressed similar sentiment in an interview with Swedish public broadcaster SVT last month, saying the captain of the ship surely "understood that there was something wrong" after dragging an anchor for over 180 kilometers.

Coming more than a year after the Nord Stream gas pipelines connecting Russia to Germany were damaged by several explosions, the Balticconnector incident raises more concerns over the safety of undersea critical infrastructure and possible measures to protect them from external sabotage.

The original article contains 419 words, the summary contains 211 words. Saved 50%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

I fucking called it.

Of course I can’t find it because Lemmy can’t search comments, so you’ll all just have to take my word for it.