IDF eliminates Mustafa Daloul, central Hamas commander in Gaza

How many innocent children needed to die for this achievement?

Almost like Hamas is systematically using civilians as human shields.
- The good guys aren't supposed to shoot the hostages.
- Even given that, Israel still has choices about what it does and responsibility for it. Israel is not forced to mass-murder civilians.
- The last dude was found hiding in a refugee camp. His decision to hide there doomed others in the camp. They do it on purpose because one side will sometimes play by the rules. Terrorists exploit that.
- Proximity shielding the wya Israel uses itet is pure BS. Read about it. Almost every use of it is questionable and made to kill civilians.
- STFU zionist

Killed about a dozen children to get him though /s

Killed several thousand ~~about a dozen~~ children to get him though
https://www.dci-palestine.org/3_760_palestinian_children_killed_twice_as_many_injured_in_gaza
Was my first reaction too, how many dead children?
Excuse me, I believe the term used was "human animals", so they would be "human animal young", not children.
/s, also fuck this world

Wrong. They want to eliminate the very last Hamas fighter while totally ignoring the Hydra effect.

What is a water bomb? (From the video)

To all the commentators that obviously know better how to act in a war:

How should Israel act to defend its citizens from the ongoing attacks? How should Israel act, so that Hamas will never be able to harm civilians again?

And don’t tell us what you DON‘T want, tell us what you DO want.

This is the fallacy that America had with black gangs. They think gangs are the problem and the problem needs to be removed.
The reality is that gangs are a solution to problems, such as wealth inequality, racism, violence.
The solution to Hamas is to remove the conditions that made them necessary, which are apartheid, violence, forcible eviction, wealth inequality.
However, Israel's goals are the ethnic cleansing of the area, so this will never work for them. Talks of peace a tool of distraction. If this is not true, then they will return to the 1948 borders, which would make a viable Palestinian and Israeli state. But they'll, make bullshit excuses of why that's not possible.
- The difference is the fact that gangs didn't just go around and steal all the food from their own neighbors to make sure they all remained poor and starving on purpose. It's not a good comparison at all.
- This is the fallacy that America had with black gangs. They think gangs are the problem and the problem needs to be removed.
  The reality is that gangs are a solution to problems, such as wealth inequality, racism, violence.
  The solution to Hamas is to remove the conditions that made them necessary, which are apartheid, violence, forcible eviction, wealth inequality.
  So you are saying the Islamic State / IS / Daesh was also the product of „conditions that made them necessary“?
  However, Israel’s goals are the ethnic cleansing of the area, so this will never work for them. Talks of peace a tool of distraction. If this is not true, then they will return to the 1948 borders, which would make a viable Palestinian and Israeli state. But they’ll, make bullshit excuses of why that’s not possible.
  Do you know that the Palestinian authorities have denied EVERY attempt of a two state solution since 1948? Why would „they“ now accept borders, they have categorically denied before?
By being defensive, not by killing children rofl
They should have thought about this when they literally picked this place for their state and other people had already claimed that land fairly.
- Israel got this land assigned from Great Britain after the 2nd world war who at the time had the right to it after the Ottoman Empire was destroyed.
  Also Jewish people were living there for thousands of years before.they were kicked out illegitimately.
  Who has the "right" to this country depends how far you go back and that argument is not helping at all in the current conflict.
  Or would you say that American people should just 'endure the rockets" if the ancestors from native americans started bombing New York?
  Even if what happened at the time was unjust it doesn't give the other party a free reign to do whatever they want