Proof by intimidation:is left as an exercise for the reader.can be trivially shown.as shown in many introductory texts.
I saw this in a HCI paper once. The prior work was just a review of current science, and had no findings in regards to the topic stated.I did not point it out to the guy. We all knew 80% of what's written in the field was bullshit.
I know its all fun and alike. But please, please get your shit together. We as people have to do better science. So many papers and "research" nowadays are just a shitshow of words which chatgpt will make even worse.
Proof by intimidation:
(prior work gives no explanation)
proof by recess:
I saw this in a HCI paper once. The prior work was just a review of current science, and had no findings in regards to the topic stated.
I did not point it out to the guy. We all knew 80% of what's written in the field was bullshit.
Trust me et al bro
As shown in the full version (the full version never got made)