Threads is All The Worst Parts of Twitter And Instagram in One Very Bad App

But Mastodon is built on a technology stack almost as old as Twitter’s, and has largely failed to achieve widespread adoption despite several mass-exoduses from Twitter. BlueSky is more promising, using a brand new protocol called AT which promises to let users not only create their own instances of the service, but filter their feeds with custom algorithms, instead of settling for one centrally-controlled “master algorithm” that prioritizes engagement above all else.

A new protocol that's not a standard being adopted elsewhere, is not promising, it's just another protocol. AT protocol is MIT license, but it's not a standard, ActivityPub is W3C standard.
Also isn't creating own instances, something that's common in fediverse, while, is there any other AT protocol instances that's not owned by Bluesky?
And isn't Bluesky a spinoff from original Twitter? What does she mean by old technology stack? LAMP? Mastodon is built on React, Redux, Ruby on Rails, NodeJS, and Postgres. I can't find any info about BlueSky's server stack, but it seems like their frontend is using React, and maybe Go.

Am I fucking crazy, or do people just pluck information out of thin air, without any fact checking and call themselves senior journalists? Does she hold any investment in Bluesky?

https://xkcd.com/927/
- This was something I missed from reddit, the always relevant xkcd
Does she hold any investment in BlueSky?
Imo, it's way more likely she got her information about BS from the website/a press release/a contact at BS and like you said, didn't bother to get a contrasting opinion from anyone associated with Mastodon (probably because it's a lot harder to get ahold of someone from a distributed project like Mastodon).
- So she got BS from BS, what a surprise... This kind of "journalism" drives me nuts, more and more medias owned by idiots with too much money promotes these kind of crap with zero nuance and fact checking :/

Tech “journalists” have no idea how to speak about Mastodon or the fediverse.

They seem to think that unless something has billions of users, it’s dead. They can’t even comprehend how people could prefer a smaller more selective userbase

Yeah tech journalist don’t seem to have any critical thinking skills. They praise any technology coming from a big tech company. I have only seen one wired article mentioning the fedivere
- They’ve just tied their careers to the profits of tech and have lost all passion they have for the nerdy hobby of their youth
Many "tech journalists" are about as old as Facebook.
When they started using devices, the iPhone had been around for years, and the only discussion platforms they ever knew where centralized platforms with millions and millions of users run by mega corporations. In their personal life experience, Reddit has always just existed, they've never known a world without YouTube, Snapchat is what they used when they were little kids, TikTok had been around long enough that's it's considered an established media outlet.
They've never seen a Usenet group, they've never had accounts on phpbb forums. Choosing a smaller platform with a more selective userbase just doesn't exist in their reality.

And another article dismissing the fediverse. This people search for a new master that can hold their data hostage

This just means that the site is a bootlicker for capitalism
Honestly surprised there isn't more. There's a lot of money that would be lost if the fediverse became more mainstream.

Threads has all your favorite social media users, such as corporate brand accounts, annoying Instagram influencers, and minor internet celebrities who aren't funny.

What bubble does the author live in where this is considered standout journalism? Like, congratulations on discovering the internet. What rock have they been living in since 1995?

The rock where they think people can't tell the difference between a press release and journalism
- How is this a press release? It’s a negative story about Threads. Press releases are positive, almost by definition.
- When have people been able to tell the difference?

The article reads as if it could have been written a month ago. My Threads timeline (albeit currently algorithmic) has settled into just accounts (news, tech, sports) I follow. Twitter is toast.

this article doesn't really make it sound any different than twitter other than not allowing porn

That's kinda the point, it's trying to be Twitter but "brand-safe".
- twitter already seems pretty brand safe judging by all the brands on it though.

Not really. Privacy wise it’s terrible, but user experience is pretty alright I’d say for a microblogging platform. In fact I feel like it’s going to threaten the fediverse by being open at first and then slowly closing up and locking people in, creating an image where all the other nodes should be part of meta’s fediverse and follow certain rules, etc.

Related content. https://beehaw.org/post/719121
- That is a great article. Everyone here should click over and read that one!
- This article is “How to Kill a Decentralised Network (such as the Fediverse)” and it tells you how Googled killed a federated protocol for instant messaging, XMPP, by the Embrace, Extend, Extinguish process.

Stupid article. Threads at the moment is much better than Twitter.

That fact that they made it natively in jetpack compose on android is actually really cool

Bad article. Not worth the read.

It's a bit weird to see Threads being referred to as Facebook's version of Twitter - wasn't Instagram already Facebook's version of Twitter, just with the gimmick being images of text rather than just the text? This seems like it's basically the same social network with a different interface - all the users are the same and the list of banned content is the same, people are coming in thinking it's the same thing so it will end up being the same.

Instagram was designed to share photos at first, with the filters added because old phone cameras sucked. Text pictures got added later as Meta adjusted Instagram to compete with Twitter and Tumblr.
- Good point, I guess I should be specifically referring to Facebook's Instagram, rather than the filter and photo-sharing app it was beforehand

I mean there's no Elon, which is the worst part of Twitter so...no

Zuckerberg is just as insidious, but further under the radar. I don't know which lizardperson I like less.
- Exactly!!! How are people just giving him a pass all the sudden? Have we forgotten who's behind these apps and their track record with dealing with user data?