3d ago

GitHub - voidauth/voidauth: An Easy to Use and Self-Host Single Sign-On Provider 🐈‍⬛🔒

github.com

A new open-source Single Sign-On (SSO) provider designed to simplify user and access management.

Features:

🙋‍♂️ User Management
🌐 OpenID Connect (OIDC) Provider
🔀 Proxy ForwardAuth Domains
📧 User Registration and Invitations
🔑 Passkey Support
🔐 Secure Password Reset with Email Verification
🎨 Custom Branding Options

Screenshot of the login portal:

Open Source @lemmy.ml

notquitenothing @sh.itjust.works

2d ago

GitHub - voidauth/voidauth: An Easy to Use and Self-Host Single Sign-On Provider 🐈‍⬛🔒

github.com /voidauth/voidauth

Self Hosted - Self-hosting your services. @lemmy.ml

notquitenothing @sh.itjust.works

3d ago

Project

GitHub - voidauth/voidauth: An Easy to Use and Self-Host Single Sign-On Provider 🐈‍⬛🔒

github.com /voidauth/voidauth

25 comments

I just (partially) got authentik running -- how does it compare?
- VoidAuth is simpler to setup/use than Authentik for sure, but of course Authentik has more features. They both support proxy-auth, OIDC, and have user management UIs so in that way they are similar. I like VoidAuth for its simplicity but you can always run both and decide, if you have any questions about setup I will try to answer!
  
  I'll definitely check it out today - I found the authentik learning curve to be surprisingly difficult. All I need is a basic set up for getting my friends and family into audiobookshelf, immich, etc, so this may be a welcome improvement
Definitely giving this a go, seems exactly what I've been looking for for my small self hosted stack.
- If you run into any issue during setup let me know! I am still working on the documentation so hopefully it is somewhat understandable 😆
the Postgres requirement is a dealbreaker for me. I don't get why all these "simple" self-hosted apps need a bloated database. how many users is a self-hoster going to have, maybe 1-10? SQLite can easily handle thousands. I'm currently using Authelia, and it even has a database-less YAML option for managing users
- On my server I run a single postgres container and create DBs and users for different apps within. Super resource light and I have 7 apps pointed at a single container. Much easier to manage backups as well when there are several apps in the single DB.
  
  You can do this with VoidAuth as well, by setting the DB_NAME variable
- I do agree. I have been thinking about adding a SQLite option which should be somewhat easy since knex (the database package that VoidAuth uses) supports it. Before releasing that I would want to create some way to migrate your data from one database type to another. If you want to use VoidAuth feel free to make an issue for this!
  
  Having run minor projects using PocketBase before and also seen what PocketBase itself can do and SQLite configured correctly in general, It's great. I've gotten to be a big fan of it by the years and gladly opt for it over the bigger ones.
  If this project got SQLite support it would be a great replacement for my own setup which requires about 3 or 4 accounts. Currently using a proprietary solution and been looking into moving to Authentik but it's a bit too heavy resource wise for my current servers.
This thing looks great but it has layers of supply-chain sploit risk. Make sure you're really secure before trying it -- and if you're (otherwise) iso27002 compliant, give it a pass.
- I would not recommend using VoidAuth to anyone who needs to be any kind of security compliant. I am not a security professional and am using packages for the OIDC and other security heavy-lifting. I can recommend VoidAuth for those just looking for a simple but good looking auth app for securing their own selfhosted apps and resources.
- I'm trying to wrap my head around your comment to understand. What exactly do you mean by supply chain sploit risk?
  The tool is using 3rd party libraries and those libraries could be used to introduce vulnerabilities in the app?
  
  This is the correct read.
  This is also the same as any other software package in existence. In fact, if someone claimed to not use any libraries, I'd be taking a close look at that too.
  The key difference is if you're a paying a company for support and certification of the product as delivered, you can yell at them about it. If you're using a free product with no support, you can yell at yourself.
How does it compare to keycloak?
- While I haven’t spun up Keycloak myself, I think VoidAuth would supply some similar functionality. Ideally the features of Keycloak that you are likely to need but easier to setup and use!
This i need to try!
- Let me know how it goes!

25 comments