Alan Dershowitz Says, ‘If You Want to Destroy Hamas, You Have to Kill the Civilians’ During Tense Piers Morgan Debate
Alan Dershowitz Says, ‘If You Want to Destroy Hamas, You Have to Kill the Civilians’ During Tense Piers Morgan Debate
So what exactly is the difference between this and terrorism? (Nothing)
Wikipedia: Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is the use of violence against non-combatants to achieve political or ideological aims.
Lol. IDF headquarters is in downtown Tel Aviv. Every accusation is projection. We really need to stop listening to this sex pest.
Sex pest or CHILD RAPIST?
he can be more than one thing, hes versatile
Killing civilians is the best way to ensure that Hamas will have a steady supply of volunteers
If you're going to die anyways...
Isn't the attempt at that exactly how you get more hamas?
Insurgencency operation math: 10 insurgents before - 2 killed insurgents = now you have 20 insurgents
Which is exactly the point. They need Hamas just like George Dubya needed "terrorists" so they keep manufacturing them.
Palestine has the right to defend itself.
Israel doesn't
Is that your final solution, Al?
"Can I phone a fascist?"
I think at some point you have to ask yourself "if killing 10s of thousands of innocent people is necessary to achieve my goal... does that make me the 'baddie'?"
He has to defend Israel because he was on Blackmail Island and now they have controversial video material of him.
Trump and the Israelis wont stop the war. Why would they? Trumps "peace" is a farce and a delaying tactic.
There is a special seat in hell for Alan 'Diddy' Dershowitz, if hell exists
He's correct, but that doesn't justify it. Just the opposite.
"If you want to destroy Israel you have to kill the civilians"
Is exactly the same logic.
That would destroy Israel, but that doesn't make it the right thing to do
What are you trying to say here?
That's the only viable strategy - if there was some number of Palestinian civilians that Hamas could operate among with impunity, it would do. I don't think Israel is currently fulfilling its obligation to protect civilians as much as is practically possible while still fighting a war effectively, but civilian casualties would be high even if it was simply due to the nature of urban warfare against an enemy operating among civilians who have nowhere to evacuate.
The fuck are you talking about.
Israel is actively aiming for and shooting unarmed civilians standing in line to get food for their starving families.
Fuck Israel fuck the IDF, and anyone who supports them
I agree that the notion that Hamas can be defeated by denying it food, and furthermore that doing so justifies starving the civilian population, is indeed something I consider well outside the boundary of civilized warfare. The fact that Israel is doing that makes it hard to believe that it is seriously attempting to minimize civilian casualties in other ways. With that said, my point is that Dershowitz is still in principle correct.
Strategy? Genocidal much?
"They're all Hamas. Even the babies." Guy, it's not about Hamas, it's about exterminating the indigenous semitic Palestinians.
Could you please point in a map of Gaza to the areas you would consider it "acceptable" for Gazans to fight in.
"If you want to destroy bigotry, you have to kill the bigots." How does that sound, Alan?
Sounds better than what he said, you're not advocating for killing bystanders.
I came here to up-vote this comment. Thank you for posting it.
Better?
They're literally no better than Hamas at this point. Hamas's who deal is, "fuck it. We'll kill the innocent with the guilty, let Allah sort it out."
Please give me: statistics on the bystanders killed by hamas vs. statistics on the bystanders killed by the Israeli occupation forces
EDIT: Misread comment, but hamas still clearly values human life more than Israel
It's amazing that, even after realising that Zionists are dishonest fascists, you still unthinkingly accept their characterisation of Hamas.