Sheltering in a Bunker, Iran’s Supreme Leader Names Potential Successors
Sheltering in a Bunker, Iran’s Supreme Leader Names Potential Successors
www.nytimes.com
nytimes.com
This article is reliable. The author is Farnaz Fassihi. She has solid Iranian elite sources. She has lived and worked in Iran, has covered the country for three decades and was a war correspondent in the Middle East for 15 years.
Turning off the internet seems to be what is required to bring back human empathy, as evident. Without widespread disinformation and propaganda, the people of Iran are unifying around a common cause, helping each other. Meanwhile, every counterattack on Israel seems to be further erroding Netenyahu's favorability. Israel's government may have overplayed their hand by bringing death and destruction to the civilian population that otherwise didn't seem to feel the full weight of the government's genocide in Gaza.
Why they would choose now to punch an enemy with the means to punch back, is baffling!
Ive seen people in Iran saying the opposite. Probably the reason ive heard it is because its amplified by pro western media but still.
These irainian people are saying that they're optimistic about the future and they are confident that Iranians will be able to adapt to the changing circumstances and the freedom from of the current government.
It doesnt seem like people are rallying to the side of the already unpopular Iranian government.
We have seen how a post western regime change country in the region would look like with Iraq and Afghanistan.
Short version: it does not end well
Iran is one of the most ressource rich countries in the world with control over the most important sea for global oil and gas transport.
There is no way that a forced regime change from the outside wouldn't lead to decades of proxy wars for the resources.
Also Israel has shown its regime change vision for Syria. Break up the country and pit peoe against each other so that a contender to regional hegemony can never emerge again.
Don't get me wrong, like the US, I don't want to lump the civilian populations trying to survive with the govt. I think the article is trying to highlight, and to my point, that without stability from their leaders, they are seeing the humanity return in the vacuum of a stable and supportive govt. I agree that media here and abroad like to show their bias and seem to have a objective. It just feels like a lot of the internet and social media is aimed at division and dehumanization. In the absence of this global networked interconnectedness, the Iranian people are finding a joint purpose and reconnecting with their neighbors. They are doing what humans are known for doing across time, freely opening their homes and showing the kindness and unification needed when faced with an existential threat.
I don't think we'd see something like that here while the internet and rage propaganda still runs!