GNOME introducing stronger dependencies on systemd
GNOME introducing stronger dependencies on systemd
blogs.gnome.org
Introducing stronger dependencies on systemd
16 comments
-
-
Bad idea.
-
Mind elaborating?
-
Not OP, so i've got no idea why they think it's bad, but systemd breaks with unix's key design principles, and monopolizes and absteacts more and more aspects of system management. Some people do not like this.
-
More reliance on something is always bad. If the component dies, becomes closed source, implements telemetry etc it will be harder to replace it.
-
-
16 comments
Not a problem. If I managed a distro, I'd have already dropped Gnome back in, like, 36, in favor of MATE and XFCE anyway.