Checkmate dronies

And where do they do it most? In your chair, man!

Does dronies define liberals only or is it anyone center-right?

I think it means imperial core liberals, and I think it’s in reference to:
But now that drones have become ubiquitous in warfare, it doesn’t make much sense anymore.
- i want to imagine that it came from a world too innocent to believe that drones would become so ubiquitous in warfare. lol
Dronies? Is this an evolution of takies? A subspicies?
- I think it originally referred to the people supporting the droning of civilians in the middle east in guise of "fighting terrorism". Nowadays it refers to liberals who blindly support everything NATO and their allies are doing.
- don't know; that's why i asked

Cat's are not communist, they are anarchists 100%

I recognize "Uni" the cat from https://youtube.com/@Unicouniuni3

Let's be honest. If a cat could choose its job, it would choose landlord, but only if "generic capitalist who exploits people" is not an option. They are the least communist animals.

You try explaining private property to a cat

Socialism dies as soon as a single person becomes its absolute leader. From there, it is just a walk toward authoritarism.

Oh you mean in a fictional scenario that does not exist in the real world?
Why are you making up scenarios that have never existed?
- To be honest, I know little about Mao and beginnings of PRC - I'm quite ignorant about how much of an "absolute leader" he was.
  But I do believe that idolizing a person and concentration of power are dangerous to democracy.
  And it's interesting how much responses I got on this topic.
I love authoritarianism because it means "when nonwesterners rule". And then the socialism becomes (socialism in a nonwestern language).
- I would say that Hungary is currently quite authoritarian. And Serbia too. Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy were too, very much so.
I agree kinda, I don’t think Mao weaseled his way to becoming an absolute leader, more like history created the specific circumstances that lead to him in that position and the historical situation of the 20th century created all these leaders. We like to pretend that the west didn’t have these single person political leaders, but honestly what the fuck was Henry Kissinger or FDR? These figures exist all over 20th century history most countries literally had their leader.
Maos biggest mistake was not absolving himself of responsibility and power because guess what those things are fucking awesome and most humans who have responsibility and power love it and never want to give that shit up just look at old people.
- Mao was ousted from power as time went on due to mistakes made during the Cultural Revolution. He wasn't an "Absolute Leader," he was extremely popular for successfully leading a socialist revolution and implementing extremely successful policies (towards the beginning and middle).
- I think that this video gave me the best insight into how China works nowadays, and I suspect things weren't entirely dissimilar in the past: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1TeeIG6Uaw I also looked into things like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_People%27s_Congress and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Congress_of_the_Chinese_Communist_Party after starting from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China and it seems that things are pretty complicated. For example: Due to the temporary nature of the plenary sessions, most of NPC's power is delegated to the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPCSC), which consists of about 170 legislators and meets in continuous bi-monthly sessions, when its parent NPC is not in session.