Google Play’s latest security change may break many Android apps for some power users. The Play Integrity API uses hardware-backed signals that are trickier for rooted devices and custom ROMs to pass.
Google Play’s latest security change may break many Android apps for some power users. The Play Integrity API uses hardware-backed signals that are trickier for rooted devices and custom ROMs to pass.

Google Play’s latest security change may break many Android apps for some power users

Bullshit. Google's primary aim is to make sure that Android builds which aren't Google-approved and may not integrate Google's profitable services as deeply are not commercially viable.
Remember to leave one-star reviews for any apps that use this shit.
I mean, both things can be true? I know banks are pushing on Google to improve Android security, to avoid malicious apps with root access from messing with banking apps.
The fact is that a rooted phone can definitely be less secure if the user doesn't 100% know what they're doing, in the same way that always logging in as root on a Linux system can be.
I don't think that's true. They could both be aims, but one would be secondary (or at least not primary).
I don't think they're both true at all though. I don't believe for a second the risk posed by/to users invested enough to root their phones is high enough to warrant this nonsense. The cynical/profitable explanation seems a whole lot more likely, imo.
GrapheneOS is more secure than Google stock.
How do you know this? Do you have a link to a source that says it?
I've tried (not especially hard) to find sources in the past citing actual incidents where end-user devices running non-stock Android or with root access led to bank fraud or data breaches. I didn't find anything to suggest that's a problem in the real world.
The main malware problems I have seen reported for Android are: