Clarence Thomas Secretly Participated in Koch Network Donor Events
Clarence Thomas Secretly Participated in Koch Network Donor Events
www.propublica.org
Clarence Thomas Secretly Participated in Koch Network Donor Events
63 comments
-
-
Big fucking surprise. The SC is illegitimate and hopelessly corrupt.
-
“I am the Senate”
-Justice Sheev Alito
-
-
I was just reading an article yesterday that basically said, the more this court reveals itself to be a partisan tool, the more likely it is that its rulings will be disregarded. After all, the court has no enforcement power. All it can do is render its opinion.
-
-
He needs to permanently recuse himself from every case ever. This guy is a fucking mockery of the American Justice System.
-
He won't because he knows he's hurting the libs. Man this is extremely depressing.
-
-
Surprise appearance from Ken Burns
-
Ken Burns: Corruption. It’s a 12 part series that’s 150 hrs long.
-
David Koch funds a lot of PBS shows so I guess it makes sense he’d have to schmooze but you’d also think Ken Burns, of all the world’s documentarians, would be able to find funding without much effort.
-
Funding ain't easy!
-
-
-
At some point the shit mountain has to get so big impeaching him is the only option. Right?
-
Republicans have to give a shit about ethics and the rule of law first, or be voted out. I wouldn't hold my breath.
-
As long as Republicans hold any amount of power, they will abuse it to protect their own no matter how corrupt, unethical, or illegal the actions. They know that if they break lockstep even a little bit, their unpopular authoritarian pyramid scheme will crumble.
"We investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing."
See also: https://www.texastribune.org/2023/09/16/ken-paxton-acquitted-impeachment-texas-attorney-general/
-
The Ken Paxton thing is especially telling. He was impeached by Republicans, but the second the impeachment started generating national coverage, they backed off and said it was fine.
-
The Eleventh Commandment was a phrase used by President of the United States Ronald Reagan during his 1966 campaign for Governor of California. The Commandment reads:
Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican.
-
I mean, let's be honest here - none of the gifts, favors, or special treatment Thomas has received has changed his decisions. He was always going to pick the most reactionary, oligarch-friendly position. No one has ever said, "The court looks pretty split on this issue, and Clarence Thomas may be the deciding vote."
If you're going to bribe a Justice or try to sway the Court, you pick a moderate. You don't pay the Kool-Aid Man to charge through walls, it's just what he does.
-
-
I stopped waiting for King Louie to "Say the thing" that gets his head lopped off...
For the record I'm speaking in metaphor, this is in no way a threat or call to arms.
-
-
That’s no secret, he’s a member of that whole party. I’d be actually surprised if someone proved he didn’t.
-
There will never be legitimacy with him on the bench.
-
-
The article referenced: https://www.propublica.org/article/clarence-thomas-secretly-attended-koch-brothers-donor-events-scotus
Saved you a click.-
Isn't that the exact same article that was posted here?
-
Yes, and I couldn't get it to load without going to propublica.org directly. So I linked it directly, to help others. There's still a few flaky things about the fediverse, and since I'd gone to the trouble to find the article, I figured to save others a few clicks.
-
-
-
It is time for the executive and legislative branches to act. They can remove him.
-
Team Red controls the house, and the house would have to be the body to start impeachment hearings. Why would Team Red remove a judge who is being bribed by Ream Red backers and decides cases in favor of Team Red?
The US "checks and balances" system was never designed to deal with this kind of problem.
-
-
63 comments
Imagine the outcry if instead this was a liberal justice at a Soros donor event. You'd have so many antisemitic dog whistles that it would attract every canine in the tristate area.
I really don't understand how anyone who likes logical consistency can tolerate Republicans. The hypocrisy is mind boggling.
That's the neat part, they don't.
This is a (paraphrased) description of the conservative world-view that I saw the other day (sorry I don't remember who to attribute) here on Lemmy. Anyway it sure seems to track with their hypocrisy.
The missing bit of context to make it logically consistent is that they think we all live in a hierarchy (social, class, gender, race etc) in which the rules apply differently to folks lower in it than they do to folks above them.
If you accept that as your premise, everything about their behavior is logically consistent- except for the part about inventing a magical hierarchy that only exists in their agreement that it does, in which they are your superiors and it is their right to tell you what to do but never vice-versa.
If you look at it in this light, when they howl at democrats for breaking rules they don't think apply to republicans, they aren't invoking anything like a set of shared rules applying to everyone, they're invoking the hierarchy and they think they're putting people in their rightful places (never mind that it's colossally arrogant and entitled to assume you're here to rule over your inferiors when there's no agreement that anyone here is anyone's superior)
As long as I’ve paid attention to politics, republicans have been massive hypocrites and have not give a damn when called out.
That's why "They go low, we go high" has always been a joke and I was shocked when Obama was serious and not just "saying that"... That's the kind of naivety that we don't need in a battle against Right Wing Fascists
Same really
It's because in the heavily divided Senate, there is no way he would be removed, and failing to remove him after impeachment would be taken as tacit approval of his corruption.
Democrats are just not touching that with a ten foot pole.
All someone has to do if there's any backlash is to say "both sides" and people will immediately dismiss it.