Zuckerberg calls India world leader for 'embracing messaging to get things done'

Apparently they're also pretty good at shooting people in other countries too.

- When Zuckerberg is calling a country a world leader and other countries are accusing that country of killing their citizens on their own soil it should be mentioned.
- If activists and their supporters have privacy they cannot be targeted as easily.

Nearly everyone I know from India uses WhatsApp so this statement checks out. I wish my own friends and family would stop using iMessage/SMS and use something like Signal. The only other app they use is Snapchat and I kinda hate that one.

- Sounds like the vendor shouldn't exist then. Find a new one.
Snapchat is easily my least fav messaging app but yea, crazy popular where I am
People even use it as their main camera lol
I take longer to answer stuff on WhatsApp
I thought Telegram is quite big there?

Worth reading about for how Facebook locked in markets in developing countries

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet.org

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook_Zero

In particular, see the bits on 'Net neutrality criticism' and 'Impact'

TLDR: Accessing Facebook is easier or even free, accessing the rest of the internet costs money. Thus making it so poorer communities only use Facebook, and say that "Facebook is the Internet"

Few quotes:

In 2015, researchers evaluating how Facebook Zero shapes information and communication technology use in the developing world found that 11% of Indonesians who said they used Facebook also said they did not use the Internet. 65% of Nigerians, 61% of Indonesians, and 58% of Indians agree with the statement that "Facebook is the Internet"

[Internet.org] has been criticized for violating net neutrality, and by handpicking internet services that are included, for discriminating against companies not in the list, including competitors of Meta Platforms' subsidiary Facebook.[5][6] In February 2016, regulators banned the Free Basics service in India based on "Prohibition of Discriminatory Tariffs for Data Services Regulations".[7] The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) accused Facebook of failing to pass on the four questions in the regulator's consultation paper and also blocking access to TRAI's designated email for feedback on Free Basics.[8][9] On February 11, 2016, Facebook withdrew the Free Basics platform from India.[10] In July 2017, Global Voices published the widespread[11][12] report[13][14] "Free Basics in Real Life" analyzing its practices in Africa, Asia and Latin America, and concluding it violates net neutrality, focuses on "Western corporate content",[11] and overall "it's not even very helpful".[12]

Here is a list of the countries, at least for Facebook Zero: ::: spoiler List of countries

         Jordan: Zain Jordan
     Albania: Telekom Albania; Vodafone Albania
     Algeria: Djezzy;[14] Mobilis
     Angola: Unitel S.A.
     Bosnia and Herzegovina: ERONET
     Bangladesh: Grameenphone
     Benin: MTN Group
     Cameroon: MTN Group
     Canada: Freedom Mobile
     Croatia: Bonbon;[15] Hrvatski Telekom;[16] MultiPlus Mobile;[17] Simpa;[18] Tomato;[19] Vipnet
     El Salvador: Movistar
     Fiji: Digicel
     France: SFR
     Germany: E-Plus[20] Ortel
     Greece: WIND Hellas[21]
     Georgia: MagtiCom
     Guinea: MTN Group
     Indonesia: XL Axiata
     Kenya: Airtel Kenya
     Kosovo: iPKO
     Malaysia: DiGi
     Morocco: Maroc Telecom
       Nepal: Ncell[22]
     Pakistan: Telenor Pakistan; Jazz Pakistan, Zong Pakistan[23][24][25][26]
     Palestine: Jawwal[27]
     Panama: Cable &amp; Wireless Communications
     Philippines: Globe Telecom, Smart,[28]
     Poland: Play[29]
     Qatar: Vodafone Qatar
     Saudi Arabia: Saudi Telecom Company[30]
     South Africa: CellC (Discontinued the service), Vodacom, MTN Group
     Suriname: Digicel
     Trinidad and Tobago: Digicel
     United Arab Emirates: Du[31]
     United Kingdom: Three
     Zimbabwe: Telecel Zimbabwe
     Zambia: Airtel Zambia

:::

Just another casual reminder of who actually pulls the strings of global politics..

"Get things done" is incredibly baby-brained liberal idealism. Worse, it's awfully close to an Umberto Eco warning signal about "action for action's sake" which coincides with liberal idealism. That's why so much western entertainment is loaded with "the Adults In The Room" who "Get Shit Done" and that shit getting done is usually atrocities justified by the plot.

None of these words are in the Bible of business and personal productivity.

I work with a group based in India. They have a completely different culture around messaging. Things I would consider worthy of an email comes as a message from them (i.e. doesn't need immediate attention/ escalation).

They are also very formal when initiating new messages, almost like they're following the same social standards as if they met you in the hallway (e g. Hi, how are you? Btw, I have this thing I need to talk to you about.). Mind you, this is all the time after exchanging dozens of messages a day.

I'm not saying there's anything wrong with it, just lends some credence to what Musk said.

Slap this fucker in irons. We don't need billionaire global politics - the game.

And while you're at it get musk too - for interfering in the attack of our ally on an enemy regime.

Who would've thought