Government Workers Cannot Be Fired for Their Political Views | The First Amendment forbids widespread loyalty purges.
Government Workers Cannot Be Fired for Their Political Views
Long gone are the days where something being against the law essentially meant it couldn't be done. You can scream that the things they're doing are illegal, but at this point it doesn't even matter; the law has lost its relevancy, and won't stop or even slow down the people in charge.
Laws are for other people, duh.
Sure they can. Trump doesn't care if it results in thousands of suits against the government he isn't on the hook for any of this. He never will be. It's disgusting.
Pretending that the law matters during a fascist coup is not productive.
The first amendment and the rest of the constitution is only as valid as it is enforced.
The legal justice system has allowed Trump to shit all over the law with zero consequences (other than some showy mugshot and pony-show bullshit like that) thus far.
The armada of military personnel and federal employees who've sworn an oath to defend the constitution from all threats foreign and domestic, have yet to step up.
The only route to justice with even a shred of possibility of actually happening is if the next guy doesn't fucking miss... and there aren't many people willing to gamble their life/freedom on taking that shot. There likely aren't any people left who're willing to take that shot. But that fantasy is the basket holding every single one of our eggs.
Tldr, the law doesn't mean shit, and we're most likely fucked.
Trump has already been ignoring the rulings of judges. Successfully, I might add. And without any consequences.
This means that the rule of law is now over, and that the constitution is irrelevant and ultimately unenforceable.
This is always the game plan of fascists: to remove from power anyone in a high enough position who would obey legal processes, such that when true opposition occurs, there is no-one left who will enforce the law. Then they can move out into the open, pull down any part of the law or the legal system that they donāt like, and start doing the truly reprehensible stuff.
Itās why they objected to Obama filling that Supreme Court position that opened up (which he had full legal rights to re-fill), so that they could pack it with a crony that they could control, stacking the Supreme Court in their favour. And just look at how corrupt it has become.
Mark my words, shit is going to get really dark within the next six months to a year. Like, concentration camp dark.
I sure wish you were wrong, but you're not, damn it.
Clearly they can be.
And be reinstated by the courts. But that takes time
And non-complicit judges.
So far courts are also being ignored. Itās going to take time to work its way up, but eventually will depend on whether there is enough integrity in the Supreme Court to uphold the constitution and the courtās prerogatives. It depends on whether there is enough integrity in Congress to uphold separation of powers, the Constitution, or at least enough self-interest to protect Congressās prerogatives
Wow, someone should tell Trump he's not allowed to do that!
This article is well-argued, well-written, and moot. Rule of law has been replaced with rule of Trump, and it's downright quaint to pretend that precedent, illegality, or the constitution are still in play.
Still good to articulate all the violations. Well informed populace and all that jazz.
The only thing evil needs to succeed is for good men to do nothing and that is exactly what is happening. But are they really good if they stand by and do nothing.
Backed up by what? Stern talking to? Fear of embarrassment? Public pressure? A moral compass? Perhaps there is another Amendment that applies when all else has failed...
Ultimately, by jail time for contempt of court
I appreciate the discourse and that you took the time to link the article. Unfortunately, I think the only thing that article does is lay out an effective strategy for the offending party to delay, escalate, enrich, and flee.
To the final point of the article saying that eventually you would get all sorts of pressure to restabilize from entrenched parties... This administration is incapable of understanding the implications of a destabilized United States. Literally incapable. Their world view is so skewed and their echo chamber so closed that it would be like a cancer having to realize that limiting its growth is good for both it and the host. It doesn't have the mechanisms to self regulate. Neither does our current oligarchy.
Well someone better tell the people doing the firing, I guess?
Oh so they cannot oh.. Okay... Cool... Yeah... Let me guess, it's against the law? The law that the same loyalty purge persons uphold and the same laws that your dictator explicitly said he will ignore? Those laws?
McCarthy begs to differ
This is why they get them to resign in disgust / protest as well.
š¤£š
Does anyone actually believe that "The First Amendment forbids" matters to the current occupant(s) of the Oval Office one tiny whit...??
And I've little to no faith our current courts will either care or, if they do care, will have any teeth.
š«š¤”š«š¤”
Weāre gonna be fine. All the Second Amendment folks have assured us for decades we had to let them keep their guns because the Second Amendment is there to protect the First Amendment.
In this scenario, everyone should be a second amendment person.