Skip Navigation
4 comments
  • While the author is presenting a kind of clinically neutral tone, the number of times they mention that it's "addictive" is the point they're making, wittingly or not. One could almost expect nervous laughter from the author.

    TikTok shaped the internet, alright, but not for the better. The short-burst video format is engaging, but it allows no room for nuance, no room for fact checking or deeper breakdowns. We can see the effects in the rise of anti-intellectual, anti-science, and reactionary rhetoric. FFS, the "person nods and points at reposted video" while silently adding nothing is now a meme, because TikTok "creators" still do (did) it unironically, and people still (used to) eat it up.

    If anything, TikTok has abused human psychology and left society the worse for it. I hope Trump fails to prevent the ban, because if not, expect the firehose of disinformation to only grow and attention spans to shrink—a deadly combination.

    • short-burst video format is engaging, but it allows no room for nuance, no room for fact checking or deeper breakdowns

      it simply is other format, for other means. Since yt started forcing creators to put at least 12min videos for max ads revenue, you can't cover a meaningful amount of topics in an hour. Unless you start speeding them up and constantly clicking to get to the meat of the video. And that's why the short format is gaining popularity. That it lacks depth? Of course, but if I'm interested in depth, I go search other formats. Most of the info I want to get is "more or less what is happening everywhere". I don't have to understand the nuances of political and societal situation in a country on the other side of the world, to want to know that there are riots there rn

      The fact that most of people use it for cats and drama? It's been there since IRC