Rule

I expect in 120 years, kids will re-invent what they think is 1990's cyberpunk by gluing CDs and bits of broken DVD players onto their hats.

In the 1990s all internet data was transported by snails using these things called AOL CD-ROM packets.
With the TC-AOL-CD-ROM protocol, you had to keep on gluing a copy of the same CD to another snail every day and sending it off to the recipient, until you get one back confirming the reciept.
That would be destruction of antiques.
- There will be hundreds of millions of aol CDs in landfills for thousands of years.

I’m confused as to the order im supposed to be reading these in.

I speak Tumblr, I can help.
copywriteddad wrote a post about a character feeling like a fantastical steampunk machine out of coal. Someone reblogged it making fun of them saying a steampunk machine is out of coal (instead of steam, I suppose) in the tags. Imagine quote tweeting but just adding tags. However tags on Tumblr doesn't readily show up so copywriteddad screenshoted it in order to reply. The other user doubles down, publicly this time, so copywriteddad have to point out coal is needed to boil water in steampunk.
- Oh Great Tumbling Sage, I have long sought out one of your ilk!
  Tell me, should I, a humble gay, get into tumbler? It seems scary, but also fun. I saw what they did to poor John Green.
- Thank you! I was especially confused because I kept reading the last message as "what is the coal doing in the water" , giving me context clues that maybe copywriteddad was an idiot? No, I was haha
- Ah, that was very helpful thank you
Top to bottom. The bit with the white background is a screenshot of tags that other people have attached to the first post

Wouldn't technically nuclear power also be considered Steampunk?

Meaning there is no difference between Steampunk and Atompunk?

Nah, key difference is that in atompunk, the energy is typically converted into electricity.
A big part of steampunk is the pipes moving steam to the contraptions, compared to wires moving electricity.
- Hmm. Suppose you were building a nuclear locomotive. (Setting aside, for the moment, whether this is a good idea.) Would nuke→turbine→electricity→motor be more efficient than just using the rotation of the turbine to move the train?
  It can't be, right?
- That raises the question: are the Voyager probes (or anything with an RTG) considered Atompunk, or do they need random bits of sheet metal welded on to meet the aesthetic first?
I remember playing flash game years ago that was about WW1 dog fights in nuclear powered steam biplanes.
- I loved that game! The sequel was pretty good too, if I'm thinking of the same one

There's a movie called Steamboy whose premise is the creation of a device that can store steam at nearly infinite pressure

So with a device like that, you might not need coal for your flying machine =)

I feel like storing steam at nearly infinite pressure is easier than getting steam to nearly infinite pressure
- That's actually covered in the movie as well! They needed to find special water to make infinitely-pressurizable steam =)
- I think It's, like, a Bag of Holding, but for steam.
At that point just call it magic no? Magic that works in metal pipes and spheres.
- Seems sufficiently advanced enough 👍
where do you think you get the steam from in the first place
- Coal, but the fantastical flying contraption in this thought exercise uses a container of pre-pressurized steam, so it wouldn't "run out of coal" like the one in the post. It'd just run out of steam
Ah, I loved that movie but had forgotten the name.

Steampunk is powered by magical non-heated water vapor motors rule.

Steampunk implies extremely polluting industrialized and unbathed Victorian slave labor rule.
- I’ve always wanted, to FLYYY, in strange machines!
I mean...a steam engine is a heat engine that uses steam to transfer heat. So you can make a steam engine by getting basically anything "really hot" and running steam through it. This is the working principle behind solar thermal power plants (but not solar panels!). I.e., you don't necessarily need coal or even a fossil fuel to build a steam engine.
- But if you put mirrors or magnifying glass as the heat source you lean too much towards solarpunk :)
- Yes, but the whole aesthetic of steam punk is fantastical machines that operate on Victorian-era technology, which would be coal-fire steam engines.

Dayumn, they doubled down on that shit. Thats a rough lookout for humanity.

What, you think stupid people were invented after the stream engine? Humanity got this far despite the fact that half of us are brainless dickheads.
It's fine. It beats being just smart enough to know you're not contributing.
It's actually two different people. And I looked at the notes and they're not even the only two. One person got really mad and called OP a "stupid fucking asshole" in their "correction".
I had no idea people were so passionate about the belief that coal can't be used to heat water.
Anti-intellectuals by don't double-check their facts.

Space 1889 gets its steam from solar thermal generators which power its steampunk space ships (ether vessels).

It gets its punk from it being about colonialism.

Colonialism is punk. TIL teehee
- Resistance to colonialism is punk =)
- Cyberpunk depicts a techno-integrated capitalist hellscape in the same way. They essentially take ideas to extreme conclusions to show how hellish things will get.
  Steampunk's alittle different, but the satirical depiction of colonialism is pretty punk.

IDK what is the coal doing to the water!? My mom didn't let me watch those videos, the stork just brings the baby right?!

:P

it runs on nuclear, silly!