Restart of Three Mile Island tests US appetite for nuclear revival
Restart of Three Mile Island tests US appetite for nuclear revival
www.ft.com
Restart of Three Mile Island tests US appetite for nuclear revival
35 comments
-
-
Didn't microshit ask feds to give them subsidized loan for this project?
These parasites never want to play capitalism, they always need state to pay them lol
But we can't have maternity leave 🤡
-
FT asking
is insane. I'm happy to pay for quality journalism but that's simply out of reach for most Americans. I'd love to know how their management determined this was an appropriate price.-
It looks like the $75/mo rate is for their "premium" package. Their standard one is $39/mo.
It looks like that's on the high side, but not radically so compared to typical American newspapers.
https://www.thepricer.org/newspaper-subscriptions-cost/
Digital Pass Subscriptions
- Local/regional papers – $10 to $30 per month Example: Seattle Times Digital – $7.99 per month
- National publications – $15 to $50 per month Example: The Washington Post Digital – $39.99 per month
Also, note that FT is British, not American.
-
Because the people who can afford and are willing to pay are a certain demographic.
It’s all about personas and marketing testing!
-
FT is global capital's preferred fake news outlet along with WSJ and CNBC.
That price is targeted for companies who play people who are part of the club, they will pay.
It is not for the plebs beyond reading the headline. They don't care if you read it.
-
-
They couldn't get it right before enshittification has gripped everything.
The companies involved, the industry, and the regulators currently can't be trusted; this project should be killed.
-
nahh mate... you are gonna pay for it ;)
-
-
Yes.
-
-
Good I hope the Pennsylvanians hate it.
-
Why would Pennsylvanians hate carbon-free power?
-
35 comments
At this point, I’ll take nuclear over fossil fuels
my man.. this is not being refurbished to replace fossil, this is being built to feed microshit's datacenters and US taxpayer gonna pay for it.
sure nuclear would be great... but this aint for us ;)
My guy, they're going to power it either way on our dime. His point is better it's nuclear than fossil at least.
Yes it is. Every plant that's live, means that things can be done more and more at scale, which drives down the price overall. In this narrow specific case, Microsoft will drive down the price which will make the already appealing nuclear (aside from NIMBY folk who will never give in because of their ignorance) even MORE appealing for baseload handling. Every plant, private or public will increase engineer knowledge and production of parts (increasing scale) which is better overall for nuclear.
And overall, these companies are going to increase their power load regardless. I'd rather new power production go to the better technology that won't actively poison the environment. Driving down the % of power generated by coal/oil should be universally applauded. Even if it's just new implementation of a large workload.
Not with this administration overseeing things