It's the same result the author of the image had before editing it with inspect element for internet points. You can see the source material on the bottom of the image, seems to match with your result.
Looks like the sources are different: In the top right of the response you can see the fav icons of the sites the AI used to get info. They are apparently the same three pages, but in a different orderdifferent pages, and in the OP it says +5 vs +3 in the other screenshot.
So it looks like they might have dropped a couple of bad sources somewhere along the way. But that doesn’t help those who already got bad answers in the meantime..
Please explain how someone uses inspect element on iOS in what appears to be the default Safari app.
Yeah I don't think I've been able to reproduce a single one of these types of posts yet. I've gotten a radically different result several times though
Okay but what if the cow is a Scientologist?
what if it's moo-slim? or cowtholic?
and what about other farmyard creatures? like the hen-do?
Tao Te Chick
A-goose-stic?
Mulemon (a mule that's either Mormon or Rastafari, dealer's choice)?
No respect for water religions, all Jewfish are very disappointed.
"LLM did something silly" must be the most boring type of concern bait out there.
No, it's not LLM did something silly, it's google / alpphabet has a defective product which millions of people realy on
I would generally consider anyone who relies on AI to be an incompetent hack
Yeah but who cares about people that are stupid enough to rely on shitty "AI" google products
People have gotten so mad at me for saying this. Seems like they're finally getting it
"Man shows that LLMs don't work the way too many people expect them to."
Called that one. Hey, this technology is like the game telephone we use to play as children, who wants to invest billions????
Strange. This is the result I get from Google.
It's the same result the author of the image had before editing it with inspect element for internet points. You can see the source material on the bottom of the image, seems to match with your result.
Looks like the sources are different: In the top right of the response you can see the fav icons of the sites the AI used to get info. They are
apparently the same three pages, but in a different orderdifferent pages, and in the OP it says +5 vs +3 in the other screenshot.So it looks like they might have dropped a couple of bad sources somewhere along the way. But that doesn’t help those who already got bad answers in the meantime..
Please explain how someone uses inspect element on iOS in what appears to be the default Safari app.
Yeah I don't think I've been able to reproduce a single one of these types of posts yet. I've gotten a radically different result several times though