win9x be like:
win9x be like:
44 comments
-
-
No one expects the Spanish preposition!
-
Its chief weapon is expressing relations! Expressing relations and marking semantic roles!
-
lmfao
-
-
"most widely used", you mean. Nothing that Microsoft has ever produced wss ever "the greatest"
-
ELI5?
-
Short answer: Windows doesn't let you name a file "con".
Long answer: Tom Scott video
-
In Windows certain words are reserved for system use. When naming files and directories, you are unable to use these words. Con, being short for "console", is one of these words. Con is also the Spanish word for "with", so a Spanish speaking user could not, for example, have a directory called "Fotos con Jim".
-
.
-
-
-
"Con" has brought us such deliciousness as "con queso" and "con carne." It has my vote.
-
Don't forget arroz con leche!
-
.
-
-
-
for the confused ones
-
I don't understand this joke; anyone care to eli5?
-
There are several reserved names in Windows. This is for backwards compatibility with mostly DOS programs. On your desktop, try and create a folder named "con", and Windows should flat-out refuse. (Same thing for "prn", "aux" and "nul")
-
lmao @ NUL. couldn't have gone with NIL?
-
-
-
or a french swear word
-
That's not limited to 9X Windows, up until W10 that's still around because Microsofts big selling point is their shit works backwards for nigh-eternity
-
in 9x it triggers a bsod tho
-
-
Captain?
44 comments
"Greatest?" No. "Most popular for desktop users?" Yes.
Most common maybe. I feel most windows users aren’t actively choosing to use windows. It’s just what they are left with.
People usually choose to use Linux or Mac. As Linux is rarely preinstalled or like Mac more expensive (when it comes preinstalled) than the windows devices for sale. I’m not convinced given a fair shake, windows would have the market share it does.
Servers have highly informed people making decisions about their operating systems. When weighing the options about uptime, security, etc they rarely choose windows. Cost isn’t really a factor relative to the price and operation of the server.
Oh, no, given an actual choice (even if it were exactly the same computer at exactly the same price), Linux would likely win out eventually if MS didn't massively step up their game. Windows has way too much stupid bullshit that its userbase is noseblind to: driver fuckery, installing applications by finding files on an Internet scavenger hunt, no built-in, centralized updating of applications, having to restart your PC for your OS to update, being consistently slower and more resource-hungry, needing a dedicated antivirus, bare minimum customization, not being able to uninstall completely useless shitware (e.g. Internet Explorer in goddamn 2024) and having the bloatware you can uninstall come back after updates (e.g. Candy Crush), the amount of dark patterns during installation, licensure bullshit, this new scheme of pressuring users into OneDrive by making it the default, ads in your "premium" OS, and I could just keep going.
MS could definitely still gatekeep their Office suite and their Copilot AI (for the few people who actually use the latter), but every other software vendor would start supporting Linux if the userbase moved there, and LibreOffice etc. (already fine for the basic office stuff most people do) would get the funding and contributors to implement more advanced functionalities.