Wrongthink

What does genocide have to do with voting though? Is there a choice? With abortion there is.

Yes Kamala is in favor of a two state solution and thinks more should be done to protect the innocents caught in the middle, and Trump told Netanyahu to “finish the job”.
Quite the choice.
- two state solution
  That’s the thing they say when they mean „I don’t give a shit people are dying, israel does what it wants”
- Ah I was thinking it was genocide vs genocide+. But that's an even easier choice then.
- So Trump is honest and Kamala lies to get votes?
  Guess who "is in favor of a two state solution" as well: Biden says he's pushing a 2-state solution. Let's put him to the test.
  Liberal memory capacity is a sight to behold.
Jill Stein. No one said you have to pick your favorite of the 2 Hitlers to vote for.
There are plenty of voting choices against Genocide. They just so happen to not be Democrat (or Republican).
- So.... No?

Except for southern “blue dog” Democrats, Abortion is a relatively “safe” topic to pander to single-issue voters on because the only people hyper-opposed to it are single-issue voters on the other side who were never going to vote liberal anyways. There’s virtually no down-side.

Israel is a more thorny & nuanced issue for Democrats though and not as clear cut. Israel is committing genocide and we shouldn’t be supporting them, but there’s alot of Jewish-American voters in key states, you’ve got AIPAC and a plethora of other Jewish/Israeli lobbies with alot of influence, you’ve got big military contractors who like Israeli money, and then you’ve got bigwigs in the military who see Israel as a strategic partner. Completely dropping support for Israel risks upsetting alot of interests and handing them over to Republicans to be used against Democrats. It’s shitty, but I’m assuming that’s the calculus going on with Democratic leadership.

Also, Israel is much much less reliant on the US for aid than in times past, and I think there’s a fear that if we stop supplying them, somebody else will and then we’ll have absolutely no influence over anything they do. We have much less influence over them than alot of people think. If they saddle up with China or Russia, the gloves come off and I think we’d see it much worse than it is now. As hard as that is to imagine, it can always get worse. And if we let Republicans get control, it will get worse.

Also, Israel is much much less reliant on the US for aid than in times past, and I think there’s a fear that if we stop supplying them, somebody else will and then we’ll have absolutely no influence over anything they do.
It seems like the prevailing narrative tries as hard as it can to bury this fact. Unilaterally withdrawing aid doesn't magically make Israel stop what they're doing, they can easily get support elsewhere. All unilaterally withdrawing does is throw away our only real bargaining chip to try and nudge them toward ceasefire.
- Who else is going to provide military aid to Israel? They are increasingly a pariah state
sooo what you're saying is.... MONEY MONEY MONEY!

I never really got this. Sure, we ALL want world peace, but what are you expecting to happen?
Israel is attacking Palestine, so I understand Palestinians wanting to protect themselves, and take out terrorists, but blowing up random israelis is NOT the way to do it.
- I don't understand what you're trying to say with this response. I agree with the reversal completely. I'm willing to listen, because I am sympathetic to all the very real destruction happening over there, but can you explain how shitting on Harris benefits Palestine at all?

Most liberals kinda hate anti-abortion single-issue voters though...

They love pro abortion single-issue voters though.
Which there are far, far more of.
- Do they? Most liberals I've spoken to on the topic seem to mostly be glad that people who were previously anti-abortion single-issue voters are now realising that their previous stance was perhaps not the best idea.