Trump judge presses his attorneys on ‘shadow government’ claims in Jack Smith hearing

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Cannon, who was appointed to the bench by Trump, appeared somewhat skeptical of their long-shot arguments, which join a long list of motions to dismiss the case.

But she also questioned whether Attorney General Merrick Garland has oversight of the case, and took the unusual move of allowing nonparties who support Trump to argue in front of her.

Cannon appeared to cast doubt on that argument, telling attorneys that judges in a similar case involving Robert Mueller did a “fairly comprehensive review.”

It’s not unusual for attorneys to throw whatever they can at trying to dismiss the charges against their clients, but judges rarely hold hearings on them — and almost never invite people who aren’t involved with the case to argue on a defendant’s behalf in an open court.

The former president faces 40 separate charges stemming from allegations that he withheld hundreds of classified documents after leaving the White House for his private Mar-a-Lago compound in Florida, then conspired to obstruct government attempts to retrieve them.

His co-defendants Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira, who are accused of helping Trump mishandle documents at the Florida property, have also pleaded not guilty.

The original article contains 575 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

7 comments

The more she digs into this shit, the more shes making an easy case to get disbarred. Let's see her psycho GOP operatives try and stop that.
- It doesn't matter. It will be too late. She's just trying to delay.
  
  Yeah, but that’s not gonna sink in for a generation or so
- Lol at disbarred. She will be in the Supreme Court if the election goes the wrong way!!
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Cannon, who was appointed to the bench by Trump, appeared somewhat skeptical of their long-shot arguments, which join a long list of motions to dismiss the case.
But she also questioned whether Attorney General Merrick Garland has oversight of the case, and took the unusual move of allowing nonparties who support Trump to argue in front of her.
Cannon appeared to cast doubt on that argument, telling attorneys that judges in a similar case involving Robert Mueller did a “fairly comprehensive review.”
It’s not unusual for attorneys to throw whatever they can at trying to dismiss the charges against their clients, but judges rarely hold hearings on them — and almost never invite people who aren’t involved with the case to argue on a defendant’s behalf in an open court.
The former president faces 40 separate charges stemming from allegations that he withheld hundreds of classified documents after leaving the White House for his private Mar-a-Lago compound in Florida, then conspired to obstruct government attempts to retrieve them.
His co-defendants Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira, who are accused of helping Trump mishandle documents at the Florida property, have also pleaded not guilty.
The original article contains 575 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Why do you let those destroying your country walk the earth?
You can’t reason with cancer - Steve jobs is really dead
We all knew something like this would happen, but noooo they went ahead and left her in charge anyway.