Manjaro 24.0 Wynsdey released

Download latest version here!

I get the joke, but it is kind of a phishing attempt.
- First of all: it's a joke.
  Second of all: no, Arch is not as easy to install, specially for someone who is looking at Manjaro as a possibility.
  And believe me, I was once a Manjaro user.
  And for 99% of Manjaro users, what they really wanted was Arch with an installer. Which is what Endeavour OS is. (Although I'll never understand why Endeavour people didn't just develop the tools FOR Arch instead of wrapping it all up as their own).
- Well, dracut and systemd-boot both come from the Arch repos. So, I would hope the Arch wiki can handle them ( and in my experience it does ).

Most notably, this is the update that brings Plasma 6 to stable (also LxQt gains Qt6 support). There are other notable changes ofc but this is probably what most people were waiting for.

The release discussion thread on the Manjaro forums (includes all updates and also support sections for known issues due to any changes).

Interesting that manjaro got kernel 6.9 before arch.

Nice
- Salty arch users downvoting... smh

Oh, Manjaro had version numbers? Interesting.

Always had - they even have names!
But the numbering is fairly arbitrary, as you can guess, and number normally changes with bigger updates.
I'm as surprised to learn this as you seem to be.
No matter what version you start with, a pacman -Syu brings you to the same point. But they update the install media from time to time and that is what the version numbers are capturing. How else would they track it? There are sometimes changes to how the system is installed. I have not used Manjaro in a while so I do not have any examples.
EndeavourOS is the same and also has versions and names. As an example of installer differences, they moved to KDE by default instead of Xfce just recently. Not long before that they moved to Dracut and systemd-boot. Id you installed a year ago, you would still be using GRUB and Xfce even after doing a full update as package updates do not force that kind of change.

upgraded here. no problems. didn't even notice the version increment until i went looking for it.

Yeah, it's never visible. I normally figure it out when I go check if Timeshift is operational (it always is, I just love double checking).

I don't like Manjaro or almost all arch bases distros because they just kinda suck and if you get mad I don't care

The arch bases distros I like are steam is that's it

Edit for people that don't know how to read I use arch I just don't like arch based distros except steam os

ok
Can you elaborate on why you think they suck? IMO most of the Arch derivates fill very good roles. Arch itself is a nice distro but you can never suit every user, and the derivates do things that Arch itself would never do.
Most importantly I believe there are lots of people who would have never used Arch vanilla but they get to enjoy "second hand Arch" and that's a good thing, isn't it?
My take on the most prominent Arch derivates (forgive me if I forget any, it's off the top of my head):
Endeavour has a rapid GUI installer. It may seem like a small thing but sometimes you don't want to go through an uber-customizable multi-hour install process. It's not a beginner vs advanced thing; seasoned users can also want to save time. This installer goes against the Arch goal of providing full install customization so it will probably never be in Arch, but it is useful.
Garuda goes one step further and offers lots of optimizations out of the box. As great as it is to have complete freedom to configure your system sometimes you want a distro to step in and do it for you.
Manjaro goes in another direction and attempts to be "stable Arch". That may sound like a wierd thing to do with a rolling distro but it works suprisingly well. The catch is that in doing so it sacrifices a lot of what makes Arch Arch; it has a "mommy knows best" approach and tells the user to not customize their system too much. This of course is complete Arch heresy (which probably explains all the rage against it). But I think it has struck a good niche as "Arch for the lazy" – people who would like a rolling distro but are afraid of bleeding edge.
- Pretty much, yeah. Definitely agree with you on that one. I use Manjaro mostly bc im lazy to install regular arch and also bc I actually found that delay in the update cycle to be really good in my case. With regular arch the times I used it broke a lot more than what Manjaro ever did for me, and I'm not that particularly interested in "bleeding edge" that much, but instead I liked arch and arch based distros because of the compatibility and tools I need. The AUR is amazing, and there's tons of custom repos to be added on top of arch which give me said tools I need to use + (yeah im lazy as hell).
  So yeah, Manjaro is pretty much a bit of a more stable arch for lazy people, so right up my alley!
- I used Manjaro and did not experience at all that it was more stable. For one thing, the packages do not get changed, just delayed. You are just as bleeding edge just not as current. The delay caused wrong packages to be installed, or unable to be installed, from the AUR sometimes. Also, mostly for governance reasons, Manjaro just plain broke more often than Arch.
  EndeavourOS just is Arch once it is installed ( especially if you remove eos-hooks which is what makes EOS report as EOS ). Everything on your system ( including the kernel ) comes from the Arch repos. Even the “unique” EOS configuration choices like dracut and systemd-boot come from the Arch repos. EOS adds a handful of optional utilities on top of Arch ( that you may never use ), some theming, and enables the AUR by default ( by installing yay and paru ). Of course, lots is people use these in Arch too.
- Happy Manjaro user here. "Mommy knows best" approach greatly helps to get onboard with Linux without shooting yourself in the foot.
  If I would be offered to start my journey with Arch, I just wouldn't begin this transition to begin with.
  And now, I can enjoy a lot of benefits of Arch, be it rolling release, independence, AUR (carefully though), from the comfort of a nice and easy to understand system designed with regular user in mind.
- Endeavour is ok I just did like it that much I like that wallpapers
  Garuda gave up on it in the installer like the look those jelly window should never be on by default and my ThinkPad Just Said No when I tried to install it I have a t480 I was testing it on there before I put it on my main pc
  Manjaro I never got it to work properly just unstable there package installer is worse then discover (discover is not bad I just can't get it working when I install it)
  I'm fine with people using arch bases distros I just don't use them and I won't force backs arch on anyone
Thanks, now drink soda
- What
- Except Tumbleweed
- Debian testing enters the room
- I agree that Arch ( well Arch and EOS ) is the best rolling distro but I am not sure I am willing say this not liking it is a skill issue.
  Not liking things is a preference. People are allowed to disagree. They are just not allowed to misrepresent the facts.
- I use arch you dum ass I just don't like arch based distros except steam