research

I do love that flat earth documentary where the guy eventually proved the Earth is a sphere.

Dude. I completely forgot that Cillian Murphy was in Inception with DiCaprio!

I'm saving this and I'm going to use it so much

Save yourself if you wish. They’ll say “well that just means that the peer-reviewed articles are in on it, too”. 🤦‍♂️

Youtube

I've never seen a published paper on how to make meth. I gotta get that info from Bill, and his parents were siblings.

You must not have looked very thoroughly.
Here's one which compares multiple synthetic routes and their impurity profiles: https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.fsisyn.2020.06.004
- To underline the joke : research does not imply publishing. Except among scientists it does. Did I get that right?

TRUTH SOCIAL ITS GOT TRUTH INNTHE NAME THATS HOW YOU KNOW ITS TRUE AND ITS BACKED BY THE MESSIAH TURNIP GODBBLESS STAY SAFE VOTE FOR PEDRO

The guy who set himself on fire actually had lots of proof.

Unfortunately the proof is just deranged connections

My name is Max Azzarello, and I am an investigative researcher who has set himself on fire outside of the Trump trial in Manhattan.
Well he certainly knows how to write a hook
Wow. That was a fascinating look into a paranoid mind.

Á la recherche du science perdú! Aka "The Sound Of Silence".

I researched the spelling of "research" for this reply. Does this count as publishing?

Like most published research isn't unreproducible horseshit mostly there because of name dropping or dollars.

Fwiw the reproducibility crisis isn't because of "horseshit" science. There are a few examples of that for sure. But the vast majority of it is just good science that happens to be wrong. The scientific method doesn't mean the wrong conclusion can be drawn, especially when for budgetary reasons sample sizes are relatively limited, or when the effect size being studied is small, or there are too many confounding variables.
That's not a mark against the studies though. It's just a mark in favour of attempting to reproduce studies and giving good funding to attempts to do so. And perhaps a mark against using one-off studies with small effect sizes to shape public policy or health advice.