It'll just get ignored. I saw a fucking padding: 0.0.3rem at work today, and it just broke the one class.
#moustache { position: absolute; bottom: 10px; margin: 0 auto; } If that doesn't work: #moustache { position: absolute; bottom: 10px; left: 50%; transform: translateX(-50%); } Relative positioning is preferred but not always available if the parent face is positioned absolutely. Edit: adjusted bottom from 0 -> 10px since 0 would be at the bottom of the chin but there is obviously some padding to bring it nearer the lip
I came here to post this and I wouldn’t have clogged up the thread with this useless comment except for your username. I salute you
Moustache seems generic for an id, maybe you meant to apply as .moustache? Let's keep things consistent pleaseEdit: center also seems unnecessary, in the beta moustaches are already aligned as a child of .facial-hair
Just use JS and get X Y position of nose and put it a few pixel below. So it would be still valid if the nose moves.
I refuse to believe that's CSS. What is that colon at the end even?
It’s a typo. The colon should be a semicolon. But since it’s the last declaration, it’s optional.
I don't think bottom is a valid value for the position property either.
It'll just get ignored. I saw a fucking
padding: 0.0.3rem
at work today, and it just broke the one class.