How NOT TO CODE: Intel's Linux Thunderbolt Utils Code is the WORST I have EVER SEEN!
How NOT TO CODE: Intel's Linux Thunderbolt Utils Code is the WORST I have EVER SEEN!
How NOT TO CODE: Intel's Linux Thunderbolt Utils Code is the WORST I have EVER SEEN!
Putting aside the "should/shouldn't do" argument, I was also wondering if the code is even viable. I imagine that 'ls' and 'sudo' are probably pretty ubiquitous, but I bet there exist some Linux installs out there with a different shell than 'bash', and some might not have 'grep' too. That would lead to some pretty cryptic bugs for the end user, eh?
I bet there exist some Linux installs out there with a different shell than 'bash',
100%. Alpine is one such distro.
Also, doas instead of sudo
Iirc Void too.
That code is a crime against nature and humanity.
I believe POSIX mandates grep and a shell that should be able to handle everything this code uses, but sudo is a problem
Debian doesn't come with sudo
and it's always annoying running into stuff that has it hardcoded (or just added by default to a command)
FYI, the Intel code used to be here (https://github.com/intel/thunderbolt-utils) but apparently was archived a week ago. So instead, the video creator posted the fork here: https://github.com/rxrbln/thunderbolt-utils
geez I tried my best not to be stereotypical, but...I am a flawed human being and I searched for their linkedin profile, it suddenly all checks out
I don't like cryptic message like this, especially if the repo seems to be gone
I don't like being cryptic at all, but "free speech" doesn't always include discriminatory ones. And being flawed, I can't stop my brain from generating those thoughts, so I just tried to be a slightly friendlier a*hole. Otherwise I could have said: PhD, yeah of course, so many of them are so used to writing shitty code without peer reviews for so long, that totally checks out. And Indian...again. well, no wonder.
I don't code, but is hardcoding sudo EVER a reasonable thing in C?
It's not reasonable in any language
it is not